No More Guessing: Our New Approach to Blog Post Approvals

By the Market My Market content team, with insights from Brett Whitaker, Lindsay Bennett-Guido, and Isabel Finazzo


 

If you’ve worked with Market My Market’s content team before, you know the routine: we’d write the blog post in a Google Doc and send it your way for feedback. You’d leave comments like “can we make this intro more concise,” “use a different stat,” or “I don’t love this wording,” and we’d go back and forth until everyone felt good about the words on the page. Only then would it move to posting.

That’s changed. We built a proprietary tool that generates a live preview link, so instead of a static doc, you’ll now see the blog post the way it will actually appear on your site: formatted, styled, and laid out on the live template, before we ever hit publish. It’s not something most content teams can offer (we might just be the first, we reckon). You can still leave feedback and flag anything that’s off, but you’ll be reacting to the real thing, not a preview of what it might eventually become. What you see is what goes live. No more mental translation from doc to website, and no more “wait, that’s not what I pictured” once it’s already public.

Brett Whitaker — Content Writer

From the writer’s perspective, the biggest difference in our new approach is that we can now see the full picture as we write, instead of waiting until later to see how everything comes together on the website. Watching the page take shape as we work makes it much easier to think beyond the words themselves. A headline that looks great in a Google Doc might feel too long once it’s sitting at the top of a page. A section that reads smoothly on its own might look like a wall of text when it’s actually formatted. Now, we can catch those things before the content ever reaches you for review. 

It also gives us a better sense of how each piece fits into the website as a whole. We can see where links naturally belong, how sections flow together, and where the reader might need a break or a clearer transition. Instead of writing first and seeing the finished product later, we’re writing with the finished product in front of us. That means what you review is much closer to what ultimately goes on your website, with fewer surprises between the first draft and the final publish.

Lindsay Bennett-Guido — Content Specialist: Quality Assurance

From a quality assurance standpoint, live-template review has changed what “implementing feedback” actually means. In the old workflow, clients only looked at a Google Doc, so every comment was about the content by default, as there was no layout for them to react to yet. Now that they’re reviewing the post exactly as it will appear, their feedback can be about the writing or about how it looks on the page, and it’s not always labeled as one or the other. Part of my job is figuring out which is which: is “this feels cluttered” about the wording, or about how much space that section takes up next to an image? Sorting that out correctly is what lets us fix the actual issue instead of the one we assumed.

This kind of feedback also works backward through the process. The more of it I review on the live template, the clearer the patterns get: which sections tend to draw a “shorten this,” which layout choices consistently get flagged, and which kinds of intros a client gravitates toward versus skips past. Catching those patterns is what lets us get ahead of the note entirely. If I already know a certain client trims long intros or prefers the CTA higher on the page, I can build the post that way before it’s ever sent for review, instead of waiting to hear it again.

The result is a QA pass that’s doing more than checking for typos and broken links. I’m reviewing each post against what we’ve learned this specific client actually wants, so by the time it reaches them, it’s already closer to their instincts than a first draft used to be. Fewer rounds of back-and-forth, fewer surprises, and a review process that’s teaching us something every time instead of just catching mistakes.

Isabel Finazzo — Writing Lead

Moving from Google Doc approvals to live-template blog approvals has made the feedback process a lot more useful. As a content team, we are always thinking about how to make our workflow more efficient without losing what makes content good: clear messaging, the right tone, strong organization, and a final piece that feels like it belongs to the client. Reviewing a blog in the same format it will actually appear online gives us a much better sense of how all those pieces work together.

A sentence that feels a little long in a Google Doc might work perfectly once it’s broken up on the page. An intro that seems fine on its own might suddenly feel too heavy when you see how much space it takes up before the first image. Even headings, paragraph length, and where certain ideas appear can feel completely different once the post is laid out the way a reader will actually experience it. With live-template approvals, clients are reacting to the full piece instead of trying to imagine what it will eventually become.

It also gives our team clearer direction. We can spend less time guessing whether a comment is about the writing itself or about how the content looks on the page, and more time making the specific changes that will actually improve the post. As our content process has become faster and more streamlined, that kind of clarity has become even more important. The goal isn’t just to get a blog approved more quickly. It’s to make sure everyone is looking at the same thing, talking about the same thing, and feeling confident about what’s going live.

See Your Content Before It Goes Live

The next time a blog post is ready for your review, you won’t have to imagine how it will look once it reaches your website. Your live preview will let you see the full post in context, from the headline and formatting to the images, spacing, and overall flow, so you can give feedback based on the same experience your readers will eventually have.

Take a look, click through the page, and tell us what’s working and what you’d like to change. The more we learn about how you want your content to look, read, and feel, the better we can tailor future posts before they ever reach the approval stage. If you have questions about the new review process or want to learn more about how we approach content, contact our team. It’s a simpler review process, but more importantly, it gives both you and our content team a clearer picture of exactly what’s going live.